How can one plan solve it through a transformation of Copenhagen?
It could be appropriate to start with Professor Sig L. Andersson's proposal to move to Tivoli Ørestaden, and so instead of the land built a Miniby, underground, with a lush forest on top. Such! So has sent a very strong signal that Denmark and especially Copenhagen, will go well for the environment, and this is important because Denmark is no longer so far ahead in his shoes, and when we will host the UN Climate Summit in 2009. That the proposal as I see most is a challenge so a second case - which was created focusing on the area, an area which is otherwise not much in touch, if not for these provocations and different approaches. But the focus was still moved away from the whole idea of plan design, and came instead to act on the theory that you can not just move the national treasures, a shame, because there are really many good ideas and intentions behind the proposal's nature. So that instead of making small partial solutions should develop a visionary plan that could both contain proposals for the superstructure of toggraven Haven, and the "hole" in front of Copenhagen's main railway station, a disgrace without equal, as even the first foreigners and tourists meetings. He had pointed out these sites instead, people would be able to ignore the provocation, and seen the wisdom of low total green solutions. For it is precisely the idea that people would think about, to create more green spaces, fewer cars on the streets (which could be dealt with abandoned roads and clear development of public traffic and toll), and to pull the countryside back to the city, which among other things did as it cleaned the port and set up swimming pools.
