onsdag den 25. maj 2011

Leif Kayser - Arabesque for Free Bass Accordion

I've been playing accordion for almost 28 years and have heard much about Leif Kayser and played several of his compositions and arrangements, including: 1 Symphony, Priere, Fantasy, and The Nutcracker for accordeonorkester and rates from Arabesque and Confetti for soloaccordeon. I think it is great and interesting music, and I have therefore chosen to write about Leif Kayser and his Arabesque.

In my job I will give a brief biography of Leif Kayser, where I will place special emphasis on his connection to accord tion and enter the background story for Arabesque. I have interviewed Peter Anders Nielsen, an honorary member of the Danish Accordeonlærer Union (DAU) and former chairman, to explain the story of Kayser related to the accordion and his Arabesque. After the biography, I will analyze 1st and 7 rate in order to explain the characteristic style elements of Leif Kayser compositions. Finally, I locate Leif Kayser as a composer in his time.

Leif Kayser was born in 1919 in Copenhagen. Here he grew up and came as 17-year-old into the Royal Danish Conservatory, where he studied subjects piano, organ, music theory and instrumentation. He passed his exam and was organist piano debut in 1941. Among his teachers included Paul Schierbeck (Composer), Tor Mann (conductor) and H. Rosenberg (composer). His musical abilities were exceptional, and he was reportedly able to play four-part organ rates in four different keys for leaf. In his study he wrote in 1938 his first major work, 1 Symphony, which was built by Tor Mann during a festive concert in Gothenburg. It was a huge success, and he was predicted to come up among the really great composers. But after having completed his studies in 1942 he traveled to Rome where he studied theology and philosophy. In 1949 he married Catholic priest in Rome, after which he went home, and simultaneously served as both pastor and organist at St.. Ansgar's Church in Copenhagen from 1949-1964. In 1964 he became associate professor at the Royal Danish Academy of Music, where he taught in instrumentation and directors. At his first management team had big names like Thomas Koppel, Elvi Henriksen and Tom Angle. Over the next several years teaching and composing Kayser. He was in 1989 asked to compose choral work for Roskilde Cathedral when the pope visited Denmark in 1989. It was around this time, he was diagnosed with Parkinson's disease, side effects from treatment prevented his composing. The disease progressed and 15 June 2001 died Leif Kayser.

Leif Kayser get acquainted with the accordion

Among the big names that Kayser had on its first executive team in 1964, was the man Peter Anders Nielsen. He had only recently completed his studies at the State Conservatoire in accordion Trossingen in Germany and was then conductor of the only Danish accordeonorkester at the time.

"I had looked into as a conductor at the conservatory, but had not anticipated coming in, so I was somewhat surprised when I discovered that I had been busy. During our first board hours we sat on a large round table where Kayser asked us what instruments we played. I was very nervous because it was my turn, because the accordion at the time was counted as a working-class instrument. I whispered, almost, when I was asked, but was relieved when Kayser replied: "How exciting" - for Kayser, it was not what was played, but how to play. I was young and enthusiastic, and asked him for hours, though he would not write anything for accordeonorkester. Kayser turned up for one of our orchestra samples a few months later to listen to our band. After the sample Kayser promised to arrange a piece of music for accordeonorkester. Two weeks later he made a transcription of Priere by Cesar Frank. The unit was a great success in accordeonkredse because it was so well arranged. All music on accordeonorkestre had until then been structured so that 1 and 2nd his voice had the melody and the rest of the orchestra had chords, and it was just that, Kayser bread by giving all the votes allowed to play the melody, so everyone felt they had to bear the orchestra. "(from interview with Peter Anders Nielsen)

Arabesque - for Free Bass Accordion

In 1970 the instrument was introduced as a fields of study at the Royal Danish Academy, m a missing students who had the skills to study. Moreover, lacked easy music, which could tighten accordeonspillernes skills already at music schools. Therefore, s amlingen "Arabesque" is on order from Danish Accordeonlærer Union (DAU) in 1974.

"Kayser was very motivated and was immediately started. He now sent the first pieces for accordion Mogens Ellegaard. Some days later rang Leif Kayser as Mogens Ellegaard, who say that it was nice accordeonmusik, though the pieces were somewhat harder than DAU had imagined. Kayser said: "It was not so good, because I have just written 3 pieces to. Mogens seems determined that Kayser had to continue to compose accordeonstykker, and in the following months Kayser wrote more and more pieces, in close collaboration with Mogens . How was the 10 to arabesques. "(from interview with Peter Anders Nielsen)

Arabesque was premiered by the academy in Copenhagen in spring 1975, Kayser and released them on his own imprint.

"There was a part accordeonstykker which was left over in the sense that they have missed the meeting Arabesque. 15 of these pieces was many years later published in the "Confetti". " (from interview with Peter Anders Nielsen)

Analysis of Leif Kayser Arabeske No. 1

Arabeske No. 1 starts with an exposure in the form of two waves of three each stroke, both moving up to a peak and fade away. Waves followed by an interlude where it is difficult to belong to forge a tonikafornemmelse - this gives a diffuse character. Next comes a reprise, which like the exposure consists of two waves, which grow up and come to rest. Finally playing an epilogue where the music is quiet and wears out. We can provide an overview of the piece as follows:

Exposure (step 1 - 6)

Interludes (line 6 to 17)

Reprise (line 18 to 23)

Epilogue (line 24 to 25)

Scale pattern has many names: Composers call it "Messiaen's 2nd mode "; jazz musicians call it" 8-tone scale "or" dim-point scale, where it uses when improvising over a 7b9 chord or a dim-chord. Fig. 1 shows a scale like. can be used for improvisation over E7b9 or G # dim (because G # is an E7b9 without basic tone).

Analysis of Leif Kayser Arabeske No. 7

Arabeske No. 7 is also called julearabesken. That's because Leif Kayser wrote this arabesque of "in dulci jubilo" - an ancient Gregorian Christmas hymn. Hymn, translated into Danish, called "A sweet and pleasing sound" and is in the Danish koralbog (see Annex 1). Salmen is in F major. Kayser contrast, uses F Lydian scale as basic as there are b to H. The rate is at 61 bars and fall through Christmas tune. Salmen is 16 bars long, and it is also in the first 16 bars of Arabeske No. 7, the Christmas song heard in the left hand. Following the 16 stroke rounded Christmas melody from the line 17-19 with a stroke break and then comes a repetition rate of 15-16. Then comes an interlude from the line 20-31, where especially the first line of Christmas melody played in different keys in the left hand, while the right hand ornamentation follow around in the maze of different keys. In step 31 falls reprise. Here repeated Christmas melody and ends as the 47th From line 48 to line 61 ends with rate variations over some designs, which will be highlighted later in the analysis.

One can therefore already provide an overview of Arabeske No. 7:

Theme (line 1-18)

Transition 1 (line 19-21)

Interludes (line 22-30)

Reprise (line 30-47)

Transition 2 (line 48-50)

Epilogue (line 51-62)

Christmas tune has Leif Kayser ornamented on the right hand. Decoration can be described as waves, moving rapidly up and down more than two octaves (quite accurately from a small A in step 2 to a trestreget F in step 31). In just half as the wave moves often nearly two octaves, which gives the undulating sensation, taking the game up to the highlights.

Style Elements Leif Kayser compositions based on analysis of Arabeske 1 and 7

Leif Kayser is known that one can hear each note in all his compositions (according to Peter Anders Nielsen). Listening to Arabesque No. 1 and 7 you can clearly hear each tone is incredibly clear (despite the old and poor recording). This is partly due to the fact that Kayser did not use "cool" chords, which we did not encounter in Arabeske No. 1 and 7

The music can be described as waves, then the music starts low and builds up to high points in order to finally settle down again. The numerous ornaments entries are in the music, may remind you of arabesques, and it is therefore not surprising that the plant got its name. Leif Kayser Arabesque is not the first work that provides such. Debussy wrote in 1888 a work by the same name (see Annex 2). It is obvious when looking at notes that there are many similarities between them, in the form of phrases tests with many legatobuer and a wave / arabesque-like structure. When you hear the music, it sounds far from identical, since Debussy and Kayser are working with two different tonaliteter. Debussy was the Impressionist and to break with the major / minor tonaliteten. Kayser wrote 100 years later and this time everything was broken by including tonality through twelve-tone music. Kayser works with an extended tonality, as one encounters in his Arabesque, where he for example. using a scale as dim-point scale.

It is characteristic of the ten levels of Arabesque that Kayser start each duty with introducing motifs, which he then plays with by transposing and vary them. The arabesques are not talking about a major or minor tonality, but rather an extended tonality. However, it is typical for Kayser to have a keynote and a basic scale. As mentioned in the analysis, the arabesque No 1 E as the basic tone and is built up over dim-scales. Arabeske No. 7 has R as the basic tone and is built up over a Lydian scale. Both rates have a similar structure: Exposure / theme, between games, reprise and epilogue, where the game has a different character than the rest because Kayser extends tonaliteten and feel of the basic tone disappears. When reprise occurs tonikafornemmelsen found. In layout terms, there is also a style element with Kayser. His music is very beautiful and very easy to read, making them comfortable to play for. There is no fixed plan in any of the arabesques. I think Kayser has chosen to record it so that the player should not forget the permanent records of the large amount of loose records, which occurs due the lack of major / minor tonality.

The old Gregorian Christmas tune "In dulci jubilo", as one hears in Arabeske No. 7, is far from the only Gregorian melody Kayser has included in his compositions. In Gads music lexicon is as follows:

"A main artery in his [Kayser] production is the church and organ music and choral works, which he often connects tradition deep source (Gregorian ol.) With moderate fluid flows in today's music, which is characteristic of his well-groomed style, Variations on" In Dulci Jubilo "Meditations of Requiem, 'Gregorian Paraphrase of motives" ... " (Gads Music Encyclopedia, 1988)

I can of the above extract that Kayser was very inspired by ancient classical music. He has composed numerous works, blending the old classical music with a new, expanded tonality.

Kayser and his contemporaries

Apart from the style elements that have been highlighted, it seems appropriate to place Leif Kayser, representing neoklassicismen.

As representatives of neoklassicismen include Stravinsky and Hindemith

"Neoklassicisme is in the music towards a style that arose in reaction against senromantikkens strong følelsesladethed the beginning of the 1900s. Neoklassicisme trying to combine a modern idiom of the Baroque and even earlier musical forms ... Neoklassicisme is beside the twelve-tone music the main styles of this century's first half and also has many representatives among today's musicians "(Gyldendals Tibinds Encyclopedia, 1977)

Among other Danish composers who use the same idiom as Kayser include Niels Viggo Bentzon and Ib Nørholm, both have written music for accordion.

Conclusion

Leif Kayser was a musician and composer. He has written much music for organ, choir, symphony orchestra and accordion. His most famous work for accordion is Arabesque - for Free Bass Accordion, which is 10 levels of modern music for accordion, which was written for music students. The unit was unfortunately all too difficult, and therefore played today by konservatorieelever. In Arabesque heard many intricate patterns that move up and down the pitch and making use of extended tonality without that there is atonal music, because there is tonic-feeling. Writing style of Arabesque can be described as neoclassical and I will therefore put Kayser as neoklassicist.

Morality Feud

I will first examine how the literary period through the modern bride, is linked to morality feud. Then I will describe the standards they had back then, gender roles, morality and feud, the four surveys had been on morality. It would lead me to an analysis and interpretation of Amalie Skram's novel, Lucie. Then I'll make a personal characteristic of the most important people in the novel, Lucie because Amalie Skram expresses its views on morality through the characters in the novel.

The Modern Breakthrough, 1870-1900, was an exodus of Romanticism, 1800-1870. From believing that the inexplicable things - such as why some other ugly was beautiful, some were stupid other wise - was given by God to possess a natural scientific causal explanation. During the modern breakthrough industrialization progressed slowly forward and the gap between rich and poor grew. There was a migration to the cities, so there was created a byproletariat who lived under very poor conditions because wages were poor. Småborskabets companies were now facing competition from the new factories that could mass produce their products. These economic changes had a major influence on man's ability to meet the woman and the men could therefore only at a late age, approx. 30 years, to marry. This meant that women had to support themselves. The women had very low paid jobs and were thus forced to supplement their daily income by prostituting themselves.

The women had to be abstinent before marriage, however, where men were entitled to free sex. This standard was entrenched in the gender-divided society. He was expected that boys and girls were born with different abilities, for example. that girls were good for Danish and boys were good at math, therefore, the aim was to distinguish the sex. There were schools for girls, and other schools for boys, there were gender-segregated spaces, boys and girls did not play together (with the exception of people who lived in the countryside). Boys and girls were also brought up differently. It was a father's duty to educate his son to be aware of sexual life. While it was up to her mother to keep her daughter unaware of the sexual life. This upbringing was characterized by silence and prohibition. It was instead very important to focus on issues and do, therefore, were most of the women's time spent reading, embroidering and sewing. The aim of this education was to create a humble, virtuous girl who could easily slip into the role as a wife.

For men, it was okay to have sexual relations before marriage, but if a girl had had sexual contact with a man before marriage, her future ruined. So there was a moral one for men and morals of men. This made it a "double standard" principle. Bottom throughout the segregated principle was that much before thought that it was the man's sperm that created the child and his mother was merely a receptacle having undernourished fetus via livmoren. This was called "fadermagssamfundet". As the man was the creator of all life was his role in a very vital. He had power over the children he had created, and therefore could do with them what he wanted without informing her mother.

The whole idea of "fadermagssamfundet" began to break apart for the man in 1827 took the female egg, and people began to question gender roles.

They had an idea that proletarian women had quite different desires than bourgeois women. He was expected of them sensual creatures, but what you had not foreseen was that these proletarian women had no opportunity to take part in citizenship snerperi because of their poor living conditions did not allow them to live in abstinence. These women spent bourgeois men to amuse themselves with when they needed it. Therefore, the sexual pressure on bourgeois women diminished and it became the basis for a better marriage. Female sex was then split into two, where their social status decided which category they belonged. No distinction between the proletarian woman who was seen as an easily accessible sex objects, and bourgeois woman who was regarded as an asexual being, an "untouchable Madonna".

Overall, it was thought that women are by nature not had any sex drive, and if they had to show sexual behavior was the mentally disturbed, while men had a very strong sex drive and it was unhealthy for them not to have it satisfied.

In 1869, wrote John Stuart Miller, "Women's oppression," that same year translated Georg Brandes to the Danish. Georg Brandes advocated free love, and that it was unhealthy for women to conceal and subdue their lusts.

In 1871 Danish Women's Society Was founded with the then President, Frederik Bajer.

Bjørnstjerne Bjornson wrote the 1883 play "a glove". The play was a failure by the behavior, but the "glove" morality "was received with great enthusiasm. "Glove Morality" went so far out to women and men should have equal rights in sexual life. So that men have to deal with the demands of women had been subject to date - abstinence before marriage. Bear Bjørnson believed that by living in celibacy before marriage, you could get it legalized prostitution to life, while men had morals and health benefits of it.

In March 1887, which was the highlight of morality feud, was convened to closed session in woman Danish Woman Society. They discussed the "glove" morality ". One of the speakers was Elisabeth Grundtvig. She supported the glove morality and believed that men had to learn to control their appetites, so that they might live in clean, equal marriage.

One month after was convened public meeting of women advances League, where Elisabeth Grundtvig reiterated your lectures on morality glove as she had hold of Danish society woman. It triggered a debate in the "Social Democrat" (newspaper), between journalist AC Meyer, Johannes Meyer and learning Anne Bruun.

AC Meyer believed that prostitution and unhappy marriages had engaged in social and economic misery, and was therefore in favor of economic equality between men and women. This would enable women to become economically independent and therefore free to decide whom they would marry. He also thought that it was unhealthy to repress and suppress his desires, and advocated free love and Georg Brandes.

Anne Bruun and Johanne Brandes both concurred with Elisabeth Grundtvig and also backed glove morale up. They felt that the problem lay in that the men could be satisfied outside of marriage.

Georg Brandes in 1887 came home from a long trip in Russia, and then wrote three posts in the policy. Here taunted and humiliated him Elisabeth Grundtvig and the "glove women". Then introduced Elizabeth sue policy to print the three posts. Bear Bjørnson helped Elisabeth in her trial by making such observations in the newspaper. She won the lawsuit and Policy Manager would pay off a fine.

On 14 November 1887 was again convened in Danish Woman Society. This meeting aimed to get into the moral equality requirements of agenda. The proposal was by a large majority voted down, but three days later, Bear Bjørnson invited to give a lecture, which he toured with (Engifte and many pollutants), at the invitation of the Danish Women's Society in Copenhagen. This lecture was based on an evolution of the glove morality, and most people loved the idea. Unfortunately, this lecture is not enough to start a new debate as discussions about morality feud dead soon away.

The debate in morality feud was actively participated in by writers, artists and intellectuals. There were four guidelines for morality feud. During each of the four guideline could locate participating.

Amalie Skram

Lucie

First published in 1888

The novel takes place in Christiania, now called Oslo. It takes place over approx. three years and is divided into 21 chapters. The theme is morality - in other words: is it okay to have a sexual relationship before marriage - are both men and women. The novel was written as a contribution to the debate about morality in 1888. The principal persons who appear in the novel is Lucie, Gerner and Mrs. Rejnertson.

The novel is about Lucie. She marries a lawyer, Theodore Gerner. Lucie come from the proletariat, but by marrying she becomes a part of bogerskabet. Here she is fine among women - although she herself is considered to be indecent because of her past. Lucie has had lovers before Gerner. For that reason, would like friendship onto Lucie, with the exception of a woman named Mrs. Rejnertson. Lucie is very poor to adapt to the norms contained in citizenship.

The theme is struck in the first chapter where they are introduced Lucie and Theodor. Lucie has been pregnant before she met Theodor and has lived with other men. Theodor has been married but is now a widower. Theodor is very jealous and is therefore in a dilemma whether he should marry Lucia in order to ensure that she is entirely his or her leave because he can not stand the idea that she has been with other than him. He can not do without her and decides to marry her, "No, there was no other advice, it had become to it that he married her. It was so that he could not do without her "(p. 18 line 29-31).

You get introduced properly to Mrs Rejnertson when Lucie is on visit to her. Mrs. Rejnertson is a very gifted widow. Her brother is a priest. He does not like Lucie and tells her it indirectly by pointing out how good a book "a glove". When Mrs Rejnertson is an eloquent lady she takes Lucien party and defend her.

Conflict escalation occurs slowly Lucie can not figure out how to behave decently in his marriage. The entire chamber over one day when they are on visit to a lady, Mrs Dark. It is a very good company and Lucie do it temporary good. But when the upstairs neighbor, Mrs. Rejnertson comes down to it with his family who is dressed as jugglers, Lucie can not hide his enthusiasm. She will be offered up to dance by a young man, Lieutenant Rejnertson and thanks yes. This makes Theodor so jealous that he prefers Lucie from it, and here starts a so big that Lucie flees.

Theodor do not hear from her all night. When she comes home the next day she has been raped, but do not tell Theodor it.

Lucie decides to visit Mrs. Rejnertson. She took off without telling anything to Theodor. She will be welcomed by Mrs Rejnertson and her sister Henny. The next day they met Lieutenant Rejnertson, Knut. Lucia falls in love with him immediately. He gets life to hypnotize her and told her to come to him one evening, but what she does not know is that Knut same day suitor for Henny.

When Lucie gets home is Theodor, angry and cold towards her. But when he sees that she is pregnant, he is overjoyed. Lucie is pregnant, probably not with Theodore, but with the man who raped her.

A day comes Lieutenant Rejnertson visits and tells Lucie that he is engaged but Henny. Here breaks Lucien only current happiness together and she becomes vice-versa. This is the turning point. From then indulge Lucie to Christianity.

Climax is in childbirth when Lucie Feeder's child rape and death.

There are three important people in the novel. The first is Lucie.

Lucie has before Theodor, was engaged with a mate and became pregnant with him. Fortunately the child was stillborn. Then she moved to Christiania, and lived with Mr. Olsen, and after some time she became engaged to Theodore. Seen in that era, her eyes were past uforsømmelig. Lucie is very naive and did not think that it might be her fault that she ended up with such an unhappy past "And it was her fault, perhaps? Could she help that she was so beautiful that the men could not la bli 'her? "(P. 12 line 2-5).

Lucie is very childlike in her and Theodore conditions. The first time you are introduced to both of them, save Lucie to him. Since Theodor finds her, she says, "You thought so little, I was not here!" (P. 14 line 17-18). It is very innocently saying such, only a child can find to say a sentence like this. Lucien childishness makes her too blind to gender roles "Lucie lifted his head, grabbed him with both hands around the waist, put forward to help the stomach and hipsed him up from the floor, as she said:" Søte fantetrolle my lovely! I may facilitate you and carry you, just tufuse with you, I'm so GLA ', then GLA', then GLA 'in you "(p. 15 line 12-17). Here take Lucie to even the freedom to play with gender roles. It was certainly not the chaste and humble behavior of a bourgeoisie woman should live by.

Because of Lucien's past, as proletarian woman, she is not educated by the standards which are in citizenship. It can be seen clearly that Lucie has difficulty adapting to the standards: Lucie follows a morning her husband at work. It has snowed so there is smooth. Lucie and Theodor go and enjoy themselves so well that Lucie boldly come to greet a passer-man. Since Theodor points her bad habits, "says Lucie" Oh well it was that happened to noe, you could keep a criminal sermon - otherwise you would probably miss ha noe. Not true Theodor "(p. 38 line 20-22). It was very rude to answer her husband again.

It tolerates women lity any emotions, but in a nice visit with Mrs. Dark comes Mrs Rejnertson visiting with his family, who are dressed like jugglers. Here lucie not control his enthusiasm, "No, see, see Mrs Lund! Lucie was so animated that she simply took Mrs Lund's arm and pointed to a harlequin who walked on his hands between the armchairs "(p. 88 line 6-9). After the drag Mrs grove back and says to one of the other wives "she gives me quite well" (p. 88 line 14). Here are clear that even if Lucie has been a part of citizenship by marrying Theodor, perceive their circle of her still as a working-class woman - not just by this company. When people talk about Lucie is not just nice things they say about her: We're talking Mr. and Mrs. Dark together. Mrs. Dark finds it so offensive that Theodor has married a carnival girl that she thinks that they can not treat him any more, "God where are the wicked! Yes, for now, can we not associate with him any more ... You will surely not compel me to associate with that sort of man? "(P. 26 line 1-11). While lucie old acquaintances consider her as an easily accessible sex objects. Lucie decides one day to visit his old friend, Mrs. Nilsen, but when she arrives here Mrs Nilsen visits from Lucien old together live. He has no respect for that she was married. Mr. Olsen is very intrusive and when Lucie will take his boots, he insist on making it to her "Oh my God, here we have 'a course again the uskyldi'e small pusselanken her: he exclaimed with delight and affection represented with her hands footing "(p. 60 line 28-30).

Lucien joy and childishness abates as she gets injured to the road. She undergoes a development. When she finally becomes so disappointed that Lieutenant Rejnertson not gængælder her love, she surrenders herself to the faith "repent to God and give the world an awful good day. Di could have the world, who is wanted for her, she had gotten enough of it "(p.164 lines 8-11). Lucie has abandoned hope of a better life and would rather live the last time in God's protective hands. Lucie knows that she must die, and she is not sorry "Well now the time came, and she would" lie ", so she probably died, and she would anywhere" (p. 164 lines 5-6). In the subsequent time will Lucie distance and eventually dies.

The other person is Theodor.

Theodor is a widower and has previously been married to Mrs Rejnertsons sister. He meets Lucia in the carnival and later decides to woo her. He is sexually attracted to her zest for life and sexuality "... But the joy, Lucien caresses gave him was something else entirely. Just to be near her, seeing her hand or foot, or when she lay in bed and stretched out the lovely bare arms up after him - it was to be lunet of "(p. 19-20 Line 35 -- 3).

Theodor is a good image of contemporary man "... I had the rest expected to find you in bed. You know, I would rather be when I come so late "(p. 14 line 24-26). Here is clearly seen how gender roles are distributed. It is expected that the woman must wait on the man.

Theodor spend most of their marriage to be mad and punish Lucie for the errors she makes. Theodor had held a play tonight for him and some other men. Here, he thinks that Lucie again behaved indecently. She had been loud and laughter, instead of sitting quietly and modestly. He scolds Lucie off and humiliate her for her behavior, "I told you before, and asked you to fit you, but now conjures in you just as well, and feel more and more into the es for each glass. And the clothes you do not feel in your es "(p. 35 line 25-29). After he is cold and unresponsive. He began to read a book and ignore Lucie although she tries to apologize. Only when she begs him crying and asking for forgiveness, he gives the following "... Then she went and lay down on her knees in front of Theodor bed, stroking him gently on his hand and whispered," Oh, it's wicked, Theodor, you should ha so much grief by me "... He moved the book did not move again. Lucie continued to caress his hand and repeating the same words as she bønfalende looked up into his face. Then she bent over his hand and moved his lips on to it, so that eventually was not a spot on the entire manuscript, she had not kissed ... "(p. 35-36 lines 36-9). Lucie must submit to him completely until he becomes good again. These rages and punishments taken during their marriage.

As Lucie, the day she feels Theodor at work, come to greet a man she does not know, Theodor become so sour that he did not talk to her for several days, she was drunk and trying to forget it and attaches itself to sleep on their couch. Only next morning when she literally throws herself down at the feet of him, he forgives her "... Lucie rushed toward him and threw platform onto the floor as she broke out in a high-pitched crying, begging and trygled him for forgiveness ..." (p. . 73 line 16-18). This cold is just a facade as he draws upon to educate Lucie accordance with the standards of the bourgeoisie women should live by. When he sees her lying full and sleeping on the couch thinking he "is lovely ... she take her in his arms and carry her into bed." He takes himself to do it because it will reduce the effect of his sentence "... But then he remembered that he did not ruin the matte effect of punishment ..." (p. 71 line 29-34).

To continue their real losses until Theodor finds out that Lucie is pregnant. Here he is clearly changing behavior "If you had told me, Lucie. Then I had better able to understand and very many of you who have frightened me. I'd worn more with you if I had known it "(p. 155 line 32-35).

Theodor will eventually overbæren with her and keeps her hand on her deathbed.

The last one is Mrs Rejnertson.

Mrs. Rejnertson - Karen - is a widow, she is initially described as the only one of Lucien and Theodore circle of friends who will welcome Lucie "But Mrs Rejnertson was then at any rate. She would take toward her with open arms ... "(p. 29 line 28-39).

Mrs. Rejnertson is very gifted. She can discuss on equal footing with his brother Frederick, who is a pastor. It was not normal that women were taught and could answer from him. Frederick advocates glove morality which Mrs Rejnertson saying "Suppose it complied Derre lord handskepratet ... I, for it is surely meant that preferably it should, it must surely do not just hang there and be ideal right? But then, men stayed from all saan't for the customer to marry, for up to thirty years old, and I expect something not even all bachelor with, they would certainly be so drained by all the creature that they never went in cairn away and married. Why should they ta the burden of marriage on her once they had done so long "(p. 49 line 9-20). This shows Mrs Rejnertsons intellektualitet. She is clearly against the glove morality.

Mrs. Rejnertson out as the only non distance from Lucien's past, but have pity on her, saying she just out to Lucie, "I believe it to them both, and I want Di to know once and for all that your so-called historical units are not a thorn in my eyes ... "(p. 50 line 18-21).

Karen takes away from the existing morale of men and women are not equal, and men do not have to be abstinent before marriage. It shows both her by telling Lucie that she sees her past as reprehensible, and be indifferent to the norms kept women in a straitjacket. "As I turn on a cigarette" (p. 45 line 29).

In the novel, there is only one person who could be attractive to identify with, it is Mrs Rejnertson. Amalie Skram has chosen to manufacture Mrs Rejnertson sympathetic to emphasize that it is her positions to represent Amalie Skram. She uses Mrs. Rejnertson representational. Mrs. Rejnertson denounces glove morality, free love, and the established civil marriage and not even have any love or suitor, but still seems happy. From what I have assume that it is also Amalie Skram's position on morality feud. Here I can guess that she is setting aside the sexuality and thought that there are more important things than that.

A little about: spectral

When a substance emits light, it is because an electron "jumps" from one to another, which is closer to the core. An electron energy-stage is quantized. This means that it can only absorb very specific energy levels. When an electron absorbs energy (usually light), "jump" it out in a second shell. One must have an energy-stage. When an atom is in such a state is called excited or estimated. This condition is not natural for the atom to be using more energy to maintain the electron is in a higher energy stage. Therefore "fall" electron back again after some time during the emission of energy (usually light). The energy emitted by the emissions are merged the same, which is absorbed.

You send light from a chemical element through a lattice, the waves will be deflected, and you will see some obvious points. Depending on the element will be different colors. Sodium emits only one wavelength, while the mercury emits six. The distinct lines are where there is constructive interference. For there is constructive interference, the waves have shifted a whole wavelength.

Light rays do not have the same wavelength. Whether the electron takes the detour or the direct route, it sends out totally the same amount of energy. The energy can be absorbed by the outermost electron and the energy released when the electron falls back, is attached to the element. One each element emits its own light colors or frequencies. This frequency or wavelength can be measured both by hand or using a computer. Some elements emit light mixed with several different frequencies. Here one can measure afbøjningsvinklen of all different frequencies.

Mercury is an example of such an element. It emits light with six different frequencies. If you make spectral lines, for example, the sun, you will find that they do not fit with one element, but more elements combined. The sun is composed primarily of helium and hydrogen. This is evident in a spectrum of the sun.

In this way one can determine the elemental stars and remove celestial composed. This is useful because it is impossible to obtain samples of stars that are many light years away. In this way the spectral lines are very useful for astronomers and physicists in general.

The Black Nights

Story is from Tøger Torkel essays "Nights in Prague" released on the publisher Jotunheim

My summer has been incredibly boring. Beach holiday on Bornholm is not exactly what a man of 41 years wants. The highlight was a movie I saw on TV2. It was called "The Black Nights". But it was to return fantastic, the best crime I have ever seen. I could not help me to live into it, the thrill of it ran down his back, sweat dripping from my forehead and all the shocks when I jumped up from his chair. If only my summer holiday had been just as exciting. There was only one highlight:

The fire danced in the fireplace. It cast a warm red glow on the mantel, where the now dusty cups from Vienna last year, had their place. The last phrase was now written, the draft was ready. The coffee was Cuban and tasted not so good, but it was much of the book was finally ready for enrollment. It lacked only the initials: C Harri J. Elson. Birds flew in large flocks outside. Jack got up from his broad royal blue office chair, and his vinyl coated desk. He lifted the long glass sliding door aside and stepped out onto the terrace. From it one could look out across the beautiful mountain scenery in North Carolina. In the distance he could discern the desolate, dry swamp and desert areas in Death Valley. At that drove a Land Rover up the long winding gravel paths. A puff of smoke rose up from the rear tires, and Jack was now aware that the coming visit. He left the terrace, went through the fireplace room, down the massive oak staircase, through the hall and out the front door. In the same second as he opened the door, Land Rover came turned sharply around the corner and out came Matthew Lance.

They went through the cabin and up to the small lounge with fireplace. The fire had burnt out. Matthew walked calmly toward the desk and pulled silently out the big office chair to sit down. Thoughts of around Jack's head. My masterpiece of mine and only mine. He knew that Matthew had seen the draft book.

Matthew looked up at Jack. He knew immediately what was los. Without mediate a word, he rose and went out on the terrace. They had been friends a long time, so they had become writers together and now Jack was begun on a new book without Matthew. Jack came out on the terrace and walked beside him. There was awkward silence between them. One could only hear the wind in the trees. Matthew took a step away. Why is he so? What have I done to him? It should be fine for him. All the times I've helped him, been there for him! He owes me after all the times I've taken his party. He went quietly into the cottage, knowing that he had to do something.

In the evening during dinner they sat and talked about old authors asked Matthew to his book. Jack was about to have dinner in the wrong throat. He did not know what he should answer, a wrong word and the whole thing would go wrong. His life's work would be lost, and a brilliant solo career. He finally fremstammet that it was not a book that way, but more a kind of encyclopedia, in which he wrote down ideas for other books. He knew that Matthew would not jump on it, but it was worth trying!

Matthew stand up: "I have often thought of a solo career, you know, beside that we could indeed still write books together anyway." Matthew went up behind Jack and began to massage his shoulders. It was now the perfect time had come. Now he lacked just do it. Lots of pain to frame Jack. There grew a hatred, it was blazing hot, just as the fireplace had been. Matthews hands were moving farther and farther up Jack's neck. Suddenly they took a firm grip. Jack got a shock and tried to get Matthews hands away, but they got stuck. Jack became more and more purple in the head, he fought for his life. He knew that his last hour had come.

Matthew so pathetic at Jacks bloodshot bluish face and said mockingly: "Nothing lasts forever Jack Harrison Elson, my friend, nothing lasts forever!" Then he laughed to himself, but suddenly became serious. He ran out onto the terrace and watching the late evening sun, the darkness soon fell on. It needed to be done should be done now. He glimpsed towards the fireplace. Into the breathtaking all-eating flames ... He pushed the thought out of my head. Oh .. by crime writer who has ever a few tweaks. He would hang a rope up in the kitchen, provide a loop, place the Jack in the head and hoist him up during ceiling. Then he would read the manuscript for the book, changing the initials of the ML, and call the police. It was not Matthews fault that his friend was so sad over his solo book, that he committed suicide .. right? No living soul would accuse him for anything.

Everything was planned, he could only just read the last page of the draft. The night was still young and there was a long way home, but it was just much now, because his career was saved. He would be returned to the palace and the calm atmosphere on Arlington Road shortly. He was so absorbed in her own thoughts that he almost overlooked the bend, and the powerful "biløjne" who stared at him. He rose out of the car. "What the hell .." Matthew ran to the mysterious car that seems to go in with the darkness. The car held virtually across a marshy grussti, so he was unable to get past. He was caught .. cold sweat ran down their backs on him when he, with an aggressive gesture opened the car door. "Why in heaven's name you park your car so inappropriate? Are they aware that they could have knocked me dead? And I sight-"Matthew was interrupted by a dry female voice:" Oh, I'm so terribly sorry, but I'm lost, my car are punctured, and I'm so scared .. Will not you help me? "Matthew looked at the woman's face slowly came into view in billygternes inserts. She was very attractive. "I offer you a ride, but I do not want company." She stepped elegantly out of the car and walked calmly towards him. "Will not you Sir?" She said in an imploring look, as she showed a little cleavage. He pulled back slowly to the car and he glanced at the script lying on the back seat. He looked at the pretty young woman, and then said: "Yes, take then with." When they had sat in the car for a while, did Matthew notice that the woman glanced over the back seat and the draft.

"What are these papers you have in the back seat?" She asked in a soft voice. "It's just no work. Nothing special. "Matthew said, adding:" And what interest you have in it? "

"You must excuse me, but I have not so good. I have shown a little carsick. They could hardly be so kind as to keep to the side of a second? "Matthew drove into the side, and the woman asked if he had some water she had to get. Matthew went on to the baggage compartment to take water. Meanwhile the woman had moved him to a hillside. Matthew ran to her and gave her water. "Not to be intrusive, but could not keep my hair away from my face?" Matthew sighed, but obeyed and grabbed the long blond hair. But to his surprise the hair of smoke. It was a wig. Matthew felt two cold hands on his shoulders and a sharp shock. He flew as he had never done before, disappeared into the deep swamp. The woman walked toward the car, opened the car door took the script and thought: Finally. Finally I can get the success that I have my whole life has merited.

Okay, as you might imagine, it was not here my summer vacation episode. But why can not all summer vacations not be as exciting as a crime? Drama is as much more exciting than a beach holiday with the family on Bornholm!

Integration

Integration is a topic that has been weighted high in the general election anno 2007th Denmark has become a popular country to seek asylum in - 503,699 immigrants per fine. 1. January in Copenhagen municipality. [1] This is an increase of 0.5% since 1 January 2006. [2] If immigration continues at the same high level, we need to change the reforms - this is policy aware. But the Danish people must also get used to the great migration. In fact, it also has a responsibility to help the Danes to become a part of a community and let them integrate. [3] A part of the integration is inter alia to find work. The policies are also aware. One of the goals of an integration policy is that more immigrants and their descendants, must work and be self-supporting. As the basis for this must have an education so they become more attractive on the labor market. [4]

Danish Peoples Party believes that such a wealthy country like Denmark, of course, to help people fleeing from life-threatening situations. Denmark to help them to get an accountability so they do not come to live in the goo of the Danish society. They must be able to support themselves and contribute to the country. Immigrants have to accept that in Denmark we have democracy and equality. When immigrants come to Denmark, the Danish People's Party believes that we must make some clear demands on them, they must integrate themselves, deal with an education and find work. Otherwise, the Danish community's future could not be guaranteed. Can not they find themselves in this, they must go home again. [5]

Liberals want the immigrants must have the same opportunities as Danes. We must grant asylum to those persecuted, but those who have not been admitted, shall immediately be sent home again. Liberals also say that they have been admitted to integrate properly. This we must help them by teaching them in Danish society, so they get some understanding of it. It is also important that they learn about Danish behavior and democracy, since this is not something they are accustomed to from their homeland. [6]

New Alliance believes we need to think new thoughts, according to integration. Denmark is too slow to handle the different cases and it is a pity for those seeking asylum. New Alliance does on their website also aware that it can not be right that such a wealthy country like Denmark allows asylum seekers to live so isolated from the Danish society. This does not help their integration. [7]

Quite generally, the parties agree on how immigrants should behave in the Danish society and how they should be treated. They must integrate themselves into work and have to find themselves in the Danish democracy. But we, as a prosperous country, will also help them in time. We will provide starter in the form of teaching, both in the Danish language, but also in how Denmark serves as country. By teaching them in Danish, they will automatically be able to participate more in society. They could go in Danish schools, work and in general work better in the Danish society. But it is not enough to immigrants trying to adapt to our society, the Danes must also learn that there are strangers to their country. They should not be xenophobic and racist, but rather help to immigrants.

Immigrants also need to find themselves in how Danish policy. They must respect the fact that there are certain traditions, they can not bring into the country. This could for example be the tradition to get married at a very young age-often in a forced marriage. This allows the Danish society does not, and so has made 24-year rule, which has also been much debated in the election campaign in years. [8]. The reason for the parties want to retain 24-year rule is that the way to avoid an increase in immigration to Denmark. Once the rule is, can the Danish immigrants not only bring their families up here.

But even if the parties agree to integration, they disagree with the approach, so the proposed solution to the problem. Danish People's Party does not believe Denmark should be a country that approves all applications for asylum. There must be clear rules on who can get asylum, and those who receive it must integrate itself quickly. Liberals consider that all who can respect the Danish rules are accepted. New Alliance backs VK government's tightening of immigration policy, but would nevertheless also on their website aware that they think they combed over in the end. [9]

We can discuss why Nasar Khader and New Alliance has chosen to run with a tight immigration policy. Nasar Khader is himself an immigrant, and by pursuing this policy, it gives him great distrust among other migrants.

Parties' electoral promises suggests that Denmark in the future will have a tighter immigration policy, which will result in a better integration.

[1] http://inm.ecoanalyse.dk/web/asp/ResultWindow1.asp

[2] http://inm.ecoanalyse.dk/web/asp/ResultWindow1.asp

[3] http://www.nyidanmark.dk/da-dk/Integration/integration_af_nyankomne/integration_af_nyankomne.htm

[4] http://www.nyidanmark.dk/da-dk/Integration/regeringens_integrationspolitik/regeringens_integrationspolitik.htm

[5] http://www.danskfolkeparti.dk/Udlændingepolitik614.asp

[6] http://www.venstre.dk/index.php?id=5410

[7] http://nyalliance.dk/show/131/Integration__udl__ndinge_og_v__rdier.htm

[8] http://www.venstre.dk/index.php?id=4502

[9] http://nyalliance.dk/show/131/Integration__udl__ndinge_og_v__rdier.htm

Naja Marie Aidt - "Baboon"

"Baboon

- Are you ready to see the truth? "

With a short story collection Baboon has Naja Marie Aidt written out of halvfemserlitteraturen and into the new millennium. However, remains her novels just as crude and provocative, while suggestive, as they always have been. Her portrayal of situations of human life, good and bad, has made her famous works, and she has been enriched with a myriad of prices. Finally, she received the Nordic Council Literature Prize in 2008 for just Baboon. [1]

Naja Marie Aidt has been a central part of the minimalist literature which emerged in the 1990s, it called halvfemserlitteraturen. But with Baboon she is moving into new roads, and into the new society in the 21st century. Society has changed radically, and for example, sex and porn gone from being censored and forbidden to be a big part of our everyday image, in the form of advertising, television, movies and music. Issues to be debated, which is also reflected in future literature. This is also seen in the baboon, where sex plays a role in virtually all of the stories. But this is not the only "problem" is being discussed; children's upbringing and how children are being treated are also discussed. This is for example the case of Torben and Maria.

Torben and Maria is the fifth novel in the baboon. The story is about Maria and her son, Torben, as she has with her ex, Mount. First day in the story is a normal day for Maria and Torben. They have a dinner agreement with Bear, and waiting for him, they go around the pedestrian precinct. When Bear finally emerging out onto the DSB restaurant. They begin to discuss the mountain and are deeply divided. It ends with Mary returns home with Torben, while Bear is home to the mountain to buy hashish. There is now a leap in time and it is Torbens two-year birthday. Bear has a birthday gift from the mountain: a snow globe, and Torben are really pleased it. Maria may not like the principle of the mountain have purchased a gift for Torben, and therefore she throws the ball out of the window.

It is difficult to determine who the narrator is Torben and Mary; it is a mixture of the narrator and the mountain. When the mountain is telling, he shows a great degree of control over Maria and Torben, although he is not a part of their lives more. "I know so much about you now. And do not worry about Torben. I do not care. He is nothing special. I never think that he is mine. For he is yours, Maria. "[2] This quote emphasizes not only how the mountain observing Maria from a distance, but also how he disclaims all responsibility to their common Sun Maria got Torben already when she was 17 years, and one can clearly mark on her parenting techniques that she is young. In addition, she lacked support in the form of a man. Maria suggests Torben and often leaves his frustrations go beyond him. She both bitches and kick him and hit him on the way also mentally. Secretly, Torben is a cloud person, but when the other kids in kindergarten gets too close he will be aggressive and strike. This could indicate that Torben grow up and become just as Mary's mother, Maria itself, so violent of pure powerlessness. When people come too close to react both Torben and Maria with physical violence in pure desperation at not being able to handle the situation in other ways. It is clear where Maria has this violent kind of upbringing, from her mother: "You must beat him in the ass, so he will not have brands," says her mother. "Otherwise you get the crèche at the neck." [3] This quotation leads us to wonder if Maria even been violently treated as a child. When Mary throws the glass ball, the gift from the mountain, out of the window shows that she does not want contact with the mountain more. He has betrayed her, just as she certainly was as a child. They say that the first years of a child's life, have enormous importance for how the child develops through life. If Mary as a child even been suggested that explains why she believes it is right to be violent against Torben. Another reason may be that Torben is the only connection she has returned to the mountain. She is angry at the mountain and thus leaves his frustrations go beyond Torben. Although Maria rejects mountain action, she still has a great longing for what she had before. "We went up and down the pedestrian street for hours. And I had nulre your hair while you sit with your back against my stomach on the bench down by the fountain "[4] This tells the mountain on his and Maria's relationship when they were still together. Mount explains later that he has no problem with that they are not together anymore, they have had their time together. But Maria has a need for these times and the confidence it created. This is already visible at the beginning of the story when she walks down the pedestrian street and sits on the exact same bench by the fountain, together with Torben. And in this way she creates, as mentioned earlier, a connection to the mountains and their time together through Torben. Parsing Mon Montagne words that tell it appears that he also is aware of Maria's situation: "You go in the ring, Maria, and it amuses me to follow you: pedestrian, anger, bitch ..." [5] The mountain is here referring to how Mary, true to form, take a walk down the pedestrian street and then becomes angry at her situation. These frustrations followed by violence against Torben, and so it continues day after day. But it is not only Mary's life goes in circles, even violence are rife in the family going in circles.

Baboon is a wake-up call for all of us Danes. Novelettes dealing with themes such as lust, adultery, violence against children and flirting with homosexuality. All stories exhibit some of the ugliest sides of human nature. Because of this direct, provocative and crude way Naja Marie Aidt produces the situation, the reader is just aware that there is something wrong in the society we live in. We are forced as a reader to see the bitter truth of our contemporary eyes. This way lies Naja Marie Aidt up to a further discussion of our society and the radical turn it has taken. There will undoubtedly be several prizes to Naja Marie Aidt in the future for her direct writing style and honesty about our community.

[1] http://www.esbbib.dk/fokus_paa_/litteratur/tidligere_anmeldelser/naja_marie_aidt_faar_nordisk_raads_litteraturpris

[2] Baboon by Naja Marie Aidt, Gyldendal 2006 p.67 L.13-16

[3] Baboon by Naja Marie Aidt, Gyldendal 2006 p.65 L.23-25

[4] Baboon by Naja Marie Aidt, Gyldendal 2006 p.67 L.6-9

[5] Baboon by Naja Marie Aidt, Gyldendal 2006 p.67 L.22-23

Quote: Schopenhauer

"Schopenhauer was based in that all living things seem to be driven by instincts and desire, and concluded that there behind the stable, apparently meaningful world is a metaphysical commitment that is the proper way, while the world we can readily see is an illusion an external manifestation of the will. why was his absolute masterpiece titled The World as will and idea (Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung) - a work which first appeared in 1819 but he continued to edit and expand in the decades ahead. " From Wikipedia

Every goal is achieved while beginning a new quest, and so it will be by in an infinity.

Any idea of what kind it may be, any object, is presentation. Only the will is thing in itself.

Death is the philosophy inspiring genius. If death does not exist, nobody would deal with philosophy.

Loneliness is all great minds fate. A fate that sometimes regretted, but still always chosen as the lesser of two evils.

Courtesy is as hovercraft: even if there is something in it so attenuated life shock.

Life without pain - has no meaning.

If you do not live a full life, but living half a life, one might as well not live.

Anyone who does not like solitude will not love freedom.

Humans have a tendency to consider its own borders as borders of the universe.

To live is to suffer.

Religion is like fireflies. They require darkness to light.

Every truth passes through three stages before it is recognized:

First ridiculed it so violently resisted it, then it shall be deemed obvious.

Compassion towards animals are so closely connected with goodness of character that one can be absolutely sure that he who is cruel to animals can not be a good person.

The Christian morality to bear on the great and essential imperfection that it only takes people into account and let the entire animal world back without Rights.

Nothing is as despicable as when discussing with a man and doing everything to convince him - when suddenly one senses that one has with his mind to do, but with his will, he will not understand.

What people call fate is usually their own stupidity.

When people are alone, it is we discover whether we think about themselves.

A philosophy where no one can hear the tears, screams, teeth chattering and the terrible noise from mainstream mutual killings, no philosophy.

A little about: Kristian Jensen

Kristian Jensen was born on 21st May 1971 in Middelfart, Denmark and the Treasury and the Folketing for the Liberal Party. He is elected in Ringkøbing County.

Kristian Jensen is the son of independent school teacher Jens Erik Jensen and independent school teacher Ellen Jensen, and have a HH-graduated from Lemvig Business College from 1991. After his baccalaureate, he was employed as a bank trainee at Unibank Lemvig in the same year. Later he became a bank employee (1993) in the Division of Fire. He has also taken a training in the form of Finance Diploma study he conducted in the years 1993-95. He was the 2nd August 2004 appointed as new Treasurer for the Liberal Party.

Liza Marklund - "Nobel's testament"

Book Review

Nobel's testament was written by the famous Swedish crime writer Liza Marklund. The book was published in Denmark in 2006 and has been a huge success since then. Nobel's testament is the fifth book in a series of six, and is about the journalist Annika Bengtzon. For a Nobel Fest escape an assassin in and shoot the Nobel Committee chairman, Caroline von Behring, and her partner. Annika Bengtzon witnessing the murder, and police are the main witness. Police impose her secrecy, she's on leave from the newspaper where she works. But Annika can not keep himself from the case. Although she meets much opposition from her husband, she begins to investigate the murder of Caroline von Behring. The hunt for a hired assassin "The Kitten" begins, and it is not entirely safe for Annika and her family.

Nobel's testament is divided into three parts, each divided into sub-chapters are named with a date. This supports the internal composition, which is chronological. In the chapter skips around a lot of different places. There will only be "made aware" of this by a single line break.

Some places in the book are some letters addressed to Andrietta Ahlsell, who was Alfred Nobel's mother. For starters gives no sense, and you wonder why they are there, and first to last in the book you find out.

The book is told in 3.persons omniscient narrator, who follows the protagonist Annika, so one person says. The story is panoramic produced, and the narrator tells from an external perspective. We hear most about the person's appearance and behavior. The only person whose thoughts we hear is Annika. Her thoughts to get the story feels more truthful, and one can easily relate it to their lives and what they know from everyday life.

The story is written as a report, and are rarely directly involved. Internal monologues and telling comments are hardly any. This means that you get a very objective view of the different people and may even form an opinion on them.

Annika Bengtzon which is the book's protagonist, is a very modern woman. She is the mother of two, have problems in marriage and the stress of work. She is a very conscientious person, but this does not stand in the way of her work and looking for adventure. She can not help but meddle in things, and have an ability to always sneak around the problems. Annika is really a reflection of hiring the killer "The Kitten". They are both perfectionist, and both have a strong desire to finish what they started på.De desires both for adventure and challenges, and have the same stamina. One can, in other words, that Annika could have survived this murderer's life, had it not been for her commitment to her family and work. [1]

Annika's husband is very selfish. He's hard to put Annika's needs as high as his own. At the beginning of the story he gets a new job, and this takes all his time. If Annika asks him to pick up the kids from kindergarten, kicking himself and when he should have a visit from some colleagues, he is disappointed with Annika's choice of food, and scolds her out. Annika is very tired of this, and therefore initiates a flirtation with Bosse, who works at another newspaper. But it goes up to Annika that her husband still means a lot to her and therefore interrupts flirting again.

Throughout history, there will be spending much time in the scientific community, more precisely at the Karolinska Institute. There will be described how stressful the researchers are and how much they will do to pursue their own research forward. They will kill other researchers' experiments, destroy their attempts, and yes, perhaps they are also willing to kill?

Another environment that is very detailed, the newspaper where Annika is working. They are stressed, and the newspaper's new boss does not help even to this problem.

Sweden's beautiful countryside is also described very much. Therefore, there descriptions of the general Swedish cities, and their houses: "The house stood on his corner due and shone so sparkling white in the morning sun, her fine house, her own house. (...) For a house that was just in this district to be, it was not particularly remarkable, but it was nice and stylish. (...) There were no trees grew up around the house, which was a shame, but the previous owners had planted both trees and small oaks, so it would probably be fine in a few years. "[2] This is a description of Annika's new house in a small suburban town. One is not told the descriptions directly, but may even form a picture.

Nobel Testament contains everything you would expect of a crime. Liza Marklund's writing style reminds a lot about the Swedish author Camilla Läckberg's books. The place also in Sweden and the Swedish nature is described in the same way. In addition, the books also divided chapter regularly in the same way, and has also contributed letters of Camilla Läckberg's books.

Crime genre is something you've known for many years, but one of the things that have changed in recent years is that you do not have all served on a platter. We should even expect some things out, and here they added letters also added as an example. What characterizes the last five years writing style is that they remove themselves from the 1990s very tight style of writing, which Nobel Testament also bears the stamp of. In addition, the literature also become much more international, which Nobel Testament is also, in terms of its written by a Swedish author.
I think Nobel Testament was an incredibly good book. It was extremely catchy, and when you first started it was not to escape again. However, I think it was hard to find around sometimes, and this will draw my rating down. But I choose to give it 5 out of 6 possible caraway

[1] http://www.litteraturnu.dk/univers.php?action=read&id=744

[2] Nobel's Testament by Liza Marklund, 2.udgave, 2.oplag 2007 s.192

Karen Blixen - "The Ring"

Karen Blixen was born in 1885 and died in 1962. Karen Blixen is very famous for its symbolic narratives of human life histories and destinies, which ring cup clearly take. These stories were often based on her many trips abroad and experiences in particular Africa. Karen Blixen also owned a coffee farm in Kenya until 1931 when it goes bankrupt. Then she moved back to its birthplace in the Sanctuary, where she became popular as a writer. Karen Blixen was a strong woman, and is often referred to among contemporary feminists, even if she does not even described themselves as feminists. [1]

The ring is a story about the newly married couple, Conrad and Louisa. Konrad was born in disadvantaged families, especially economically. Louisa, however, comes from a fine family, with a strong economy and a strict upbringing. These widely differing backgrounds made it difficult for the young couple to get acceptance from Lovis parents. This owes to the time they lived in, namely around the 1800s. This was a time when family and his status was important.

Louisa is only 19 years, which is probably why she has a hard time letting go of his old pigeliv. The young couple living on a farm where idyll is a large part of their everyday lives, including in the form of Konrad's beloved sheep. The couple loves each other and they both have positive things to offer each other. Konrad idolizes Louisa: "Conrad, the young husband, had solemnly promised himself that from now on, no stone was found, and no shadow fall upon his beloved's Road" [2], but still have marriage is particularly important for Louisa. She could finally break with its strict upbringing and enjoy her free life.

The ring begins his real story a juni morning, when Konrad taking a walk tells Louisa about his beloved sheep. Louisa feel no particular joy in these sheep, but rather a feeling irritation at Konrad's interest in material things. Konrad stories irritates Louisa, but she shows a little interest in this particular story. It is in fact about a fåretyv are in a parlous state in the last few months. The thief has, among other things also killed a man and a disabled boy unconscious. The story puts thoughts in time with Louisa, who am I wonder if this man? Her upbringing has never given her the opportunity curiosity, but now are not as indifferent as they have ever been.

After their walk, which ends at a meadow becomes Louisa returned to the farm of Conrad. This is a clear signal of how the sheep is more important to him than she is. Louisa does what he says and goes slowly homeward, hoping that she could have confirmed his love for her. Sheep Thief is a symbol of the world Louisa never have been allowed to participate in, and therefore choose to defy her husband's words, and moving away from their usual path and into the woods real world. This quote: "her light footsteps were here quite silent" emphasizes how Louisa with his choice of the new road, has embarked on new impressions, and away from the world she knew. But all this curiosity is suddenly disturbed by a stranger. He threatens her with a knife, yet they just stand and stare at each other for a long time. "She did not ask for or tingede on his life. She was naturally fearless, and this horror she felt for him was not associated with any thoughts on what he could do her "[3], Louisa feels no fear of man, even in the form of his knife, but would nevertheless to get away. The only thing of value she carries is her wedding ring and she goes, therefore the ring toward the man, but he is not. The ring falls to the ground, symbolizing that the "covenant" she concluded at marriage dropped on the ground and go away. But Louisa may have already rejected his marital obligations, among other things because she did not go directly home to the farm, as she had promised her husband. Her innocence, which among other things can be seen in the white dress she wears, also dropped by her encounter with the stranger. The meeting with this new culture makes her aware that the reassurance she received from Konrad is not enough, she wants more.

The sheep and the wolf is not just material animals in the story, but also symbolizes a lot of things. The sheep represent Konrad, and his subservience. Louisa has lived a peaceful life among the sheep, but by sitting with the wolf (the stranger) creates the savagery and secession, she has missed in her marriage. The wedding ring, Louisa thought would be to break with her past, with the strict upbringing, has just continued on. When she loses the ring, she also loses the tape that binds her to her childhood, and this is also the knife into a symbol of her secession.

After meeting the stranger, moving Louisa out of the familiar path again when she meets Konrad. She is once again confirmed that he can not satisfy her needs, but continues nonetheless, in its old footprint, although experience with the strange man has changed her.

The ring has several references to the folk tale concepts. There are, among other things refers to the Little Red Cap [4], and the use of many images and symbols are also similar. Home-away-home principle is also a similarity between the ring and adventure. However, their structure differs because folktales are often built so that the young couple meet the love first and then is exposed to many hardships. In contrast, the ring will be paired exposure to the harsh ordeals before their love will be allowed.

The ring can be analyzed and interpreted in many different ways. For example you can also choose to look at the more erotic undertones, which are many in history. These include Lovis innocent white dress and her hair udslåede when she throws her hat in front of Conrad. Louisa is married, and this beautiful flowing hair can signal infidelity.

As previously mentioned, the ring can be analyzed in many different ways. Many interpret the ring from the person Karen Blixen and her kvindesyn. This interpretation is due to Karen Blixen often writes her stories about her own experiences and life experiences. Louisa is the person in history has been most focused on, perhaps to follow a kvindesyn on life. Louisa represents perhaps Karen Blixen, as Louisa has the same desire for a free life and adventures as Karen Blixen had. Just because she was a woman, she wished not to be bound to a dull man she was going out and experiencing things and not just stay home and listen to the man's stories.

Karen Blixen was and is a well known Danish writer who knew how to use his incredibly vivid language to compose his fantastic tales and stories. These abilities also violate the cancer in her short story The Ring, which provides for many different types of analysis. Once again, Karen Blixen excels as a writer.

[1] http://www.litteratursiden.dk/sw30627.asp

[2] S. 218 middle

[3] S.222 bottom

[4] S.220 top

Enlightenment - is it here yet?

I was in a lecture at the University of Prague (Charles University)-Hussite theological faculty, SPU rgt on the Enlightenment is still here. I was silent, something that usually falls me away and said I'd think about it. And here is the answer. (Thanks to Pavel Miladóv for this question.)

Enlightenment is based on a combination of rationalism and empiricism. Rationalists makes sense as a basis for the perception of the world, while empirister believes it is experiences and perceptions are the starting point. Enlightenment believed that human beings are born with a fundamental sense, as it is used together with his experience. Another main features of the Enlightenment is that all certain knowledge, the wisdom or experience as the source. Any claim must be justified logically or empirically, since man is a rational creature and thus able to reason and argue their own views and respecting others. They believed also in the free and independent man. Human reason played a major role in the Enlightenment. In particular it disappeared some superstitions (for example, witch trials).

One can also say that enlightenment is a reaction to the Baroque monarchy and the church's pomp and circumstance. On the whole, rooted in the Enlightenment a lot of the earlier periods. Renaissance focus on the individual and rationalism. It continues the Renaissance crumbling from the medieval mindset. Even the modern breakthrough recalled the Enlightenment. Some writers, notably Georg Brandes, believed that the modern breakthrough was the Enlightenment resurgence.

Enlightenment philosophers believed that all people are born equal, because everyone has an innate sense. This sense, we need to judge what is good and evil, right and wrong. In this way, they believed man would do well in society. Human reason could be affected by bad parenting or bad habits.

Enlightenment philosophers very positive man-it was good, sensible and responsible. They also looked very positive about the future. Leibniz [1] believed that man could make himself lord over nature, and thereby make the world a good place.

Enlightenment began in England, and then continued to France and continue from there. It formed the conceptual framework for the north American states, and was also the basis for the American Declaration of Independence was written in 1776, and the French Revolution ideals (all are born equal and have equal rights, regardless of background or social position).

Enlightenment religion also took up for discussion. It criticized the church's abuse of power and believed that human reason would be the highest authority. It does not mean that they did not recognize God, but recognizes more Deism-say belief in a God who does not intervene, after having created the world. Deism is called natural religion, as it can be understood through reason.

Another reason for starting to lose faith in the church is that there are new explanations of natural phenomena. Scientists made great progress during the Enlightenment, and this inspired future writers and philosophers. Enlightenment's most famous scientists Newton (1643-1727) and Decartes (-1650).

Enlightenment also had great influence on society. Formed agrarian reforms and in 1788 repealed adscription. During the Enlightenment aristocracy lost many of its privileges. He'll be in debt and had to sell off its estates. Therefore, land ownership is now a matter of fortune, and no fine titles. In this way, which created significant class differences. Living standards were low and conditions are strongly influenced by the recession. Due to this recession took the king loans from commercial bourgeoisie, and thus got themselves influence. This was the first time citizenship had an influence on Denmark's economic and social situation. The general public were more educated, when he began to get public newspapers, magazines and corporations. However, if there was a censorship. All manuscripts should be approved by a professor or king people. People begin to rebel against censorship, therefore repealed Struensee [2] in the 1770th

It was hard to be a writer during the Enlightenment. Ludvig Holberg (1684-1754) for example, was forced to teach at the university, and PA Heiberg [3] was banished. But the language itself evolved greatly in the 1700s. The authors began to write travel stories, which informed people about the colonization of the foreign world. Especially Daniel Defoe's [4]: Robinson Crusoe, was very well known, and still is today. At home in Denmark was the most Ludvig Holberg informing the people through his comedy. He wanted to educate people and get them to think for themselves.

Enlightenment has been influential in the society we live in today. There is still agrees that humans can be educated to their senses. Every time a teenager makes trouble, go immediately started to discuss whether the person has now been brought up properly.

Human rights is also still a part of our community. This was especially made clear when in 1948 made the declaration on human rights. It is very similar to the declaration of human and citizen's rights being drafted in 1789. Both statements about each individual's right to freedom of religion, freedom of expression and right to participate in legislation. The right to participate in the legislation include the reason for our democracy today.

Our society today is too built up, through Montesquieu's division of power from the 1748th It consists of the Legislative-(parliament), executive (government) and judicial power. (Courts). Why Montesquieu made this division of power was to protect the people. He would not have the various powers rottede together for their own benefit. Due to this division will all be treated fairly.

Reforms are also something we know from the Enlightenment. Already at the beginning of the 1700s and until 1840 there were reforms in various fields-for example, agriculture, schools and the poor. It was quite exceptional that the State took care of the weaker ones, which we still do today. We advocate and support the students with SU, the unemployed with unemployment benefits and the poor with welfare.

Comparing Denmark and other countries that have experienced the Enlightenment to the East, for example, one can clearly feel that we are influenced by this. In the East they are still very driven by their religion. They do not have democracy, and people do not have the same rights as we have here at home. This seems many are foolish, and believe that people must feel oppressed and have a bad life. But you can then discuss whether they think the same as us. They probably think that we have a bad life, because we have so many assaults, high taxes and many other things that they do not know about their culture. Denmark had not experienced the Enlightenment, we would probably live under the same conditions as they do in many eastern countries.

Without enlightenment, we would not be the same community. We would not be equally educated and do not have as much thought for our fellow man. We would also scales higher God, and may still be subject to the church's power. But perhaps we have it already, since we still pay church tax, without really show up other than that involving ourselves as individuals? Maybe the church has still taken us. Enlightenment has its roots buried deep in the Danish society.

[1] Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (July 1, 1646 - November 14, 1716), German philosopher, mathematician and political adviser.

[2] Johann Friedrich Struensee born in Halle, Germany in 1737 and died in 1772. Christian 7th life doctor.

[3] PA Heiberg. Author, playwright, translator. 1799 exiled for his writings revolutionary tendencies.

[4] Daniel Defoe born 1660, died 1731. Was English writer, best known for his novel Robinson Crusoe.

Modern art

Modern art is a much discussed topic. Everyone has an opinion about it, and attitudes are different. This will particularly be focusing on in my job because I want to work with two conflicting texts. One, Forget the pig is written by Lars Movin. He is clearly of modern art, whereas Hitler in a speech refers to the modern art as a flaw in humanity.

In this task, I will break the two text structures, to provide a better overview of their authors' opinions and arguments.

Forget the pig by Lars Movin:

Forget the pig is an article by Lars Movin. It was published in monthly magazine Press in July / August 1988. This article deals with modern art and how we understand and interpret it. According to Lars Movin modern art is about being able to look at art, without having to recognize and identify with it. People today are accustomed to everything we see must be like something. Our lives are filled with images. Pictures we are told how we perceive and understand. This means that we do not even form our own impression, but I get the contrast served on a silver platter. This is contrary to Lars Movin's position on how to interpret art. "Art is a new reality - not manufactured reality" [1], Lars Movin here believe that we have to interpret on what we see, so we choose our information and form our own reality. There is no interpretation is more correct than the other, everyone has the right to form their own interpretation, but by our desire, that art must imitate something we destroy our own chances with art. According to Lars Movin sprogliggør also art itself - but it speaks a different language without words, it speaks to us using the colors and structures. It is not meant we should try to translate that language into words, but I would rather help us to understand art. It is not always necessary to interpret and understand.

On Modern Art by Adolf Hitler:

On modern art is an excerpt from a speech, Adolf Hitler met in 1937 at the opening of an art museum in Munich. Adolf Hitler is not a great admirer of modern art. He believes that modern art is a shame for the German people, since it is merely a reproduction of art from before the Stone Age. The artists might as well have been kindergarten children as it is not adjacent to any interpretation or understanding. Adolf Hitler sees modern art as an art form supported by an arrogance and audacity which only small groups of supporters. Some people look at things differently, as Hitler believes is a visual disturbance. He is not aware whether these people indeed perceive things in this different manner, or whether they simply want to influence people with their scams. No matter what, believe Adolf Hitler, that it is his duty to save the German population from these people's art - either through the courts, or by stopping their ability to continue their family. When to stop and eradicate these people and their art believes Adolf Hitler that he ensures the German people to their senses and instincts.

Discussion of views from Forget the pig and Modern art:

There is a wide disparity in views of the two texts. It is obvious that Lars Movin and Adolf Hitler have lived / live in two different time periods and do not share the same opinions. During the time we live in now, it is in modern art. It is popular even among young people, to go to art museums. You do not understand art, to form an opinion on whether one likes it or not. You can back up his opinions based on colors and other sensory expressions we get from art.

Lars Movin's a much more modern vision of contemporary art in relation to Hitler. Lars Movin is very important that it is not necessary to be able to identify with the art. Another view, however, could be that it will be able to identify with the art, would make it easier to understand and interpret. By getting the art to look like something we would perhaps be better able to relate us to it, thus forming our own opinions. By Lars Movin also says, "There is no interpretation is more correct than the other."

Both Lars Movin and Adolf Hitler how to use the linguistic resources. Lars Movin have presented his pointer at a very understandable way, and we will call her interest in contemporary art. Adolf Hitler's also an inspiring language. He understands how to articulate it so provocative that you can not do otherwise than to oppose him.

Lars Movin opens his article with: "Do you know the feeling of missing words? The feeling of having experienced something which can not be translated into words? "[2]. This might be thought most people do. But why must also be put into words everything we experience? This could be argued was not a necessity. Some people choose to listen to a special music when they are in great sorrow or very happy. Others may choose to paint a painting. If you feel something very strongly, it would be wrong that would be dependent on having to paint a particular scene. Some lines and pixels ensemble, mixed with a variety of colors, or perhaps quite the opposite, gray and shadowy tones will give a far greater impression. It is almost impossible to express oneself in the same way by painting real motives. An artist should be allowed to express his feelings as he desires. This we see in other forms of art. A composer, for example, expresses himself through sounds and timbres. When he is in love, he writes a beautiful, slow piece of a single violin. There are long and low tones, followed by a sudden pause, then continues with a series of quick jerks of the arc. Is this not art? It is a mixture of colors, melodies and emotions.

Similarly, the lyrics always made use of abstract principles and instruments. A modern poet writes in metaphors. A rushing wave symbolizing a violent emotion, and a ticking clock symbolizes the passage of time or perhaps infinity. This is also art. Of course a painter equally allowed to express themselves through metaphors. Of course he should be allowed to paint things in ways other than the way they just appear.

Adolf Hitler believes that modern art is rubbish, "Architects and craftsmen did not work for hosting the canvases that are patched for over five hours because the artists feel that their naughty prices will ensure that the images will be greeted as utterly brilliant, brilliant works "[3]. But it would not have been possible for contemporary art that have survived for so many years, if it sold only because of their price and coverage. Moreover, modern art, respected by critics worldwide, and are assessed on a par with all other arts.

Adolf Hitler who has said a very strict compared to modern art. His opinions on modern art can easily relate to the political program he led. What was different and not listened to were to be exterminated.

Modern art makes topics under discussion and understand how to provoke people. There have been many examples throughout history of people who have managed to provoke and stimulate a discussion going. Almost everyone has heard of the artist who put the goldfish in a blender and let people have the ability to press a button to send the fish to death. He left it up to their own morals to make himself lord over life and death. Many people are surprised at this. They believe that anyone can put a goldfish in a blender. But the artist has thought creatively and provocatively by mistreating the little goldfish. It is a form of art that clearly puts ideas in motion. The artist managed to get others to perform his work, thereby creating his own points!

Henrik Cavling - "explosion"

The explosion was written in 1882 by Henrik Cavling. The text describes the terrible day in May 1882 when Dons gunpowder mill exploded. The vivid and narrative writing style touched readers, and Henrik Cavling former career as a ship's boy was quickly replaced with a job as a journalist for the Danish press. [1]

Had never before been experienced as detailed a description of a here and now experience - that's why people were so moved by his writing style.

Cavling starts to talk about how beautiful the surroundings are. How the sun throws herself down on the large beech tree crown, and the beautiful meadows and pond about it. Gunpowder work he describes as part of the valley, beautiful decor and a part of its peace. [2] All are described as idyllic, and is an example of the time period of the modern breakthrough. Throughout this description is written in great detail and with great calm words. This makes you relax and even fall in the idyllic world, and we feel that time passes very slowly. When the explosion happens, the words of writing. The sentences are short, words more distressing, and you come suddenly in a completely different atmosphere. "Eyes seeking his daughter's corpse. That is one Girl. On the tip of an old beech, whose branches are torn off, hang some rags of a dress, he knows them, it's her. "[3] We can here clearly feel Cavling change of writing style.

The explosion has claimed victims, which was hard on the local community. Henrik Cavling involvement of the girl's father, and describing his attempts to find her daughter equal must have influenced many of the readers, as this is a situation they could run the risk of encounter. The reader begins to take his life to intelligence, it dawns on him that life does not last forever. By this I mean that Henry Cavling has achieved his message, to get people to think about life and enjoy every time.

The explosion is a very good example of the period occurred in the 1880s. Denmark is a great growth in economic terms but also socially and technologically. Industrialization is in full swing, and this leads to great social contrasts. This inspires contemporary writers, and they begin to write about the social contrasts and bring contemporary issues under debate. The author of these words is Georg Brandes. He was the "brain" behind the modern breakthrough in 1871 when he gave a speech where he called on the Danish literature to bring society's problems under discussion. The topics he discussed was especially wanted: marriage, gender roles, ownership, religion and society. [4]

Part of the modern breakthrough called Naturalism. Natural science and the biological nature was a big part of naturalism. You go up in the concrete reality, and begin to discover the great natural world. This begins to affect the literature. The authors begin to study the real world and fail to write about supernatural stuff. Rather than write about the harsh reality. They do not want to embellish things, but to inform their readers about their world and society really are linked. [5] This characterizes explosion of character. Henrik Cavling is not afraid to use strong words. He does not want to embellish the incident, but want people to know how it really happened, and how it looked.

Impressionism also played a major role in the modern breakthrough. The authors wanted to give readers a photographic reproduction of an instant impression, and often contain topics in heritage and environment. They wanted to reproduce the impressions as objectively as possible so that the reader had the opportunity to interpret the text. [6] Also impressionism art direction was important. One could only take black and white pictures back then, so the colors were very important. However, there was much debate about whether the paintings were finished or not. The journalists believed the paintings were just "impressions", while the artists thought they had finished. But Impressionism art may also be related to the literature, as artists began to paint subjects from everyday life. It could be things they met in town and rural surroundings they dreamed of. Similarly, contemporary writers also wrote about the environment, and wanted to give a representation of a place in writing. This fits well to the impression the word's meaning, namely impression. [7]

This is also something that is apparent in the explosion. Henrik Cavling situation is very neutral during the story, and report only as an eyewitness. He says things very objectively, and you have even the opportunity to gain feelings and impressions. The story written in the form-I just do it more personally when you can sit in the person's place.

How things presented are much discussed today. News media always puts their own stamp on the story, and not everyone is aware of this. The newspapers inform their readers in one direction or another, by "color" their articles. The newspaper has an attitude, and that they would continue. They use loaded terms, and brings only the stories they feel are important. It may therefore be difficult for the reader to see through the real truth. The journalist is supposed to behave subjectively to things, and just tell from the facts we have. [8]

But the explosion is very unlike the media because he is so inspired impressionistic. He wants people to be able to form their own opinions and not be influenced by others' opinions.

tirsdag den 24. maj 2011

Knud Sønderby - "Two people meet"

Knud Sønderby "Two people meet" takes place in Copenhagen in the 30s. He describes the city very well and believes that it has evolved for the better. "The city resembles a large city." I think he is positive about the contemporary renewal. The main character sits on a tagrestauration and looks down over the city's hectic life. "... It is a difficult and interesting sublime feeling to see Square with the shiny gray asphalt is deep. The smooth flow of cars and bikes ... It all could easily take place in front of a newspaper, so far down it. " Everything is explained with a certain distance. He sits up and looks down at the ant hill here. Very descriptive will be told about how cars, bicycles and pedestrian flows across the streets like it was a river. Personen mulls over how people are going and where they end up when he can not keep them anymore.

"Somewhere smoking two rundpuldede hats into the air carried by the opposite arm, two people who>> know <
Knud focus on coincidences when it comes to meeting other people. Here he refers to Rudyard Kipling "The Thousandth Man", which tells about this one, out of the thousands who will pay more for one than one's own brother and the only one of the thousand will not focus on your sending or behavior . Who knows, maybe here in the stream at this very moment over the right without knowing it "writes Canute.

Stone Kaaløs "to dance with my beloved" takes place at Frederiksberg in the late '60s. It is autumn and the leaves fall off trees. He stalk down Frederiksberg Allé. The goal is his beloved, he will dance with. He meets Phantom, who tries to hitchhike to Afghanistan. Stone gives him some money for a bus and stalk forward. While he was a poet a poem, which he says will be his best ever. His thoughts fly around: vineyards, grapes, wine tamper girls wonder if they are ticklish feet. "He meets some schoolchildren, he believes some of the big girls look like exotic birds. He leaves one seemingly random thoughts follow the second. He meets the poet Roger McGough, they talk a little, and he continues. "Leaves grønnedes cats had kittens / woolen sweaters were unravel in front of both / equality / trams and buses had flags on / sun moved ten light-years closer / thousand windows were opened simultaneously, it has thus become the cause. His beloved rises out of a car. They kiss and jumps back together, upwards Frederiksberg Allé, home.

Since stone meetings Roger McGough, they fall between the neck and laughs. It is a very informal way of greeting. They do not have a lot of polite minimis barriers that keep them back.

In "Two people meet" seen it all away. The meeting between the men told no we have no idea what they feel. In "to dance with my love" we are at street level. We get to know what he thinks and feels when he meets another person. In Canute story, the two people who meet through a procedure that involves a lifting of the hat when they meet. In the poem, it is totally different, making the just as it suits them. The main reason for this is not enough time. In the 30s it would have seemed rude and decidedly strange if we had met, as Stone and Roger are doing. There had been an unwritten law that said you should keep a distance and perform these procedures, as lifting the hat or shake hands. Both texts have a rapidly progressive action. The poem is written entirely without punctuation. Here the effect that you get a feeling that the stones are very busy to get to meet her boyfriend. One senses that he has a goal, he must reach! Romanuddraget has no concrete goals. Here is a chance meeting. Knud Sønderby philosophise about how casual meetings often, and how little it takes before we had never met a person you knew.

Both texts is about to meet, but they are written in completely different ways. Knud Sønderby philosophises the theme of the meet. Stone Kaaløs poem is about a man with one goal: to meet his beloved.

Microbiology and resistance

This post is initially a biology report, based on an experimental study.

1.0 Purpose
The purpose of this study and associated report is to examine the resistance to the concept of theoretical and practical level, and examine resistance in selected bacteria with selected antibiotic.

2.0 Theory
2.1 Microbiology
Microbiology is the study which examines the smallest living organisms exist on Earth. Microorganisms are limits to how small life can be. All life is also originated from simple unicellular organisms (see Figure 1) approx. 4 billion years back, and the next 3 billion years comprised all life on earth by these simple creatures. We have found many examples of the hundreds of millions of years old, microorganisms, fungi, algae and bacteria in the resin, and from these studies can be seen that the morphology and anatomy of these organisms have not changed significantly, and one adds to it with the many different species there are, it gives a picture of this class of organisms is important additional survival and talented.
Most microorganisms reproduce rapidly and in large numbers (approximate exponentially), and this mixed with the characteristic that they can often exchange genes across families (horizontal re-exchanges), and have a high mutation rate makes microorganisms able to develop through natural selection, and this istandgør them for survival anywhere on the globe and in virtually any environment. However, there is also seen with human nature, a disadvantage of this rapid adaptation: In this task, we must examine microorganisms resistant to antibiotics, and these organisms rapidly adapt and immunized, resistance will be a very widespread problem, especially in environments with high consumption of just antibiotic (see a later chapter).
Historically, always known for microorganisms, although in many years without even knowing it. It was characteristic of micro-organisms are made vindruesaft to wine, served alcohol in beer and got food to go to decay. This time it was believed that life could arise spontaneously abiogenesis, that is an abiotic origin / creation. But in 1676 discovering the Dutchman Anton van Leeuwenhoek microscope operation microorganisms. But it was not him directly was convinced that it was the micro-life that created the above processes, but he discovered that there was life less than what the human eye could detect it in the light of this discovery that he often called mikrobiologie father.
The immediate breakdown in microorganisms are known prokaryotes and eukaryotes: prokaryotes is as the name suggests pro (pre) kernel, so these organisms have no nucleus for the protection of genetic material. Because they do not have a nuclear genetic material is free in the cytoplasm. Within prokaryotes divide Man in bacteria and arkæer. The second group of prokaryotes are all other creatures on earth. Animals, plants, slime sponges, but also many microorganisms, including fungi, algae and other things. Here follows a list of the various classes of microorganisms:

- Bacteria (prokaryotic)
- Arkæer (prokaryotic)
- Mushrooms (eukaryotic)
- Algiers (eukaryotic)
- Protozoa (eukaryotic)
- Multicellular animals (eukaryotic)
- (Virus) becomes to many not counted as an actual living organism [1]

[1] A lecturer at the Faculty of Life Sciences (former KVL) referred to a prøveforlæsning in connection with the open house event that you do not count them as living, as the virus can only reproduce inside other cells, eg in bacteria, plants and animals and also because of the lack of virus autonomously metabolism, but the dependence of the host cell's metabolic apparatus as it takes over and diverts to produce more viruses.

Below is a family tree (Figure 1) of the temporal family tree:
Being held arkæer to be more similar to eukaryotes, because that in and around their genetic material is protein hist tions, which also includes eukaryotes.

Figure 1 shows a family tree of the different classes of bacteria (prokaryotic), arkæer (prokaryotic) and all eukaryotes. By: Janus H. Magnussen, after Wikipedia.org
Click on the picture to get it up in a larger version (readable)

As the name suggests, these organisms can only be (individually) in the microscope, but these microscopes can also gain insight into the great diversity there is among, different shapes, colors, size, surface form and movement patterns and methods. However, long multicellular algae (seaweed) and colonies of bacteria and fungi (eg, mold) seen with the naked eye. Below is a graph (Figure 2) which shows the relative size of prokaryotes, eukaryotes, molecules and atoms:

Figure 2 shows the relative sizes of different organisms and biomolecules. 2. axis is a logarithmic metric system which starts at 10-9 m (1 nm) and ends at 10-3 m (1mm). By: Janus H. Magnussen, after Wikipedia.org
Click on the picture to get it up in a larger version (readable)

2.2 Resistance
Resistance is the ability to resist. The word comes from the Latin; resistentis, which means "to stand, to resist" In our experiments, we are investigating, as mentioned resistance of bacteria to different antibiotic. Resistance is in itself not necessarily a bad (we are even resistant to many drugs!) But the problem occurs if the resistance of a harmless bacterium spread to other more dangerous bacteria.

2.2.1 Antibacterials
Antibiotic word says it all: anti: against bios: life, so that the two substances can not exist in each other's proximity. The fact that some substances have the effect of other substances, molecules and organisms exploit Man in medicine to produce drugs that inhibit or kill pathogenic microorganisms. Antibiotic is not an enzyme but a molecule that can go in and work on microorganisms in several ways. They can enter the cell membrane and inhibit it from expanding, ie. that bacteria can not grow or divide. It can also modify the cell wall, for the same inhibition. Additionally, they inhibit protein synthesis in different places, either in transcription, translation or it may simply go in and change vital parts of the gene pool.
In our experiments we work with 7 different types of antibiotic:

1: tetracycline (ing)
2: ampicillin (amp)
3: sulfonamides (sul)
4: penicillin (pen)
5: bactracin (bac)
6: chloramphemicol (CHL)
7: stroptomysin (str)

2.2.2 Physiological factors that can produce resistance
Resistance may occur in different ways and be manifested in different ways. But change is always caused by natural selection, or in other cases programmed evolution. Natural selection is a part of Darwin's hereditary clarity and origin learn. Antibiotic activities can be viewed as an environmentally related pressures on the bacteria are exposed to it. Therefore, there will be a strong selection pressure to resist, ergo, the bacteria mutates to resistance have an advantage, and their genes will be in the form of new individuals be maintained. This can be illustrated by the following figure:

Figure 3: Schematic presentation of how antibiotic resistance develops through natural selection. The upper part "prior selection" represent a population of bacteria before addition of the antibiotic in the next stage is the selection made, it will say that some bacterial strains are selected from, and only those with the resistance survives. The third phase is the new generation of resistant Bakt. An additional comment could also be linked to, if the antibiotic was changed a bit, would the bacteria located in the second highest level of resistance to be more vulnerable than those with the highest level. From here one more selection to take place. By: Janus H. Magnussen, after Wikipedia.org
Click on the picture to get it up in a larger version (readable)

The forms of resistance could be developed in the final population (see Figure 3) could be a really passive resistance to the substance, for example, if the antibiotic is no longer able to bind to its target site, but a worse kind of resistance would be the production of an enzyme actively able to destroy the antibiotic, such as stafylokokkbakterien Staphylococcus aureus can produce penicillinase (enzyme that cleaves penicillin). The reason for this mutation, associated modification / creation of (new) enzyme, is worse than the passive form of resistance is that the new gene for the enzyme could be shared horizontally between bacteria, unlike the passive defense (which will often be species-specific)

2.2.3 Anatomical factors that can produce resistance
In bacteria may be cited as a form of passive resistance. A species of this type of resistance has its source in the bacterial cell wall - they can be either thick or thin. The difference between a thick and a thin cell wall, can be found by nærstudier of these. Looking at them both you will see that outside the cell membrane around this wall, which is constructed of chemically peptidoglykan (which is a combination of peptide and amino sugars glykan). In addition, there are some differences between the two types:

1: The bacteria have thin cell wall beyond the wall a second membrane in structure very similar to the cell membrane, however, there are embedded in the membrane of different substances as lipopolysakkerider and lipoproteins, and when they are built up by particular lipid, they will be embedded in the membrane lipophilic interior.

2: The bacteria with thick cell wall and no extra membrane

In order to identify the two types, the Dane Christian Gram developed a method by which the bacteria with thin cell wall is not stained, ie. gram negative, and where the bacteria with thick cell wall is stained, ie. gram positive. This kind of classification is relevant to our experiments, when the bacteria are gram-positive are generally more susceptible to penicillin, which gives us that Gram-negative bacteria are more resistant, so a passive resistance arising as a result of bacterial anatomical relationship. In our experiments we work with three different bacteria: Bacillus cereus (which is a soil bacterium), Esceria coli, and an unknown bacterium from soil samples, which I call Bacillus Magnussenae (but may be doubts about the purity of this colony). B. cereus is g + while E. coli is grams, this we can use in our hypothesis.

2.2.4 Resistance Transfer
As mentioned earlier, bacteria can exchange genetic material horizontally. This can happen when bacteria containing plasmids, which is a separate ring-shaped piece of DNA material, which in itself does not code for anything substantial (for example, propagation, metabolism, etc.) but instead may contain genes which may increase the organism's survival, if the activated in a given situation. However, these plasmids can be relatively easily transferred to other bacteria, which can happen in three ways:

1: Conjugation: As is a process where two cells independently exchange and combine genetic material. It happens when the two cell membranes fuse together, forming a pilus. What happens is that one cell (a) wraps up its plasmid and transfers it to the cell (b) of both cells to DNA polymerase (or an equivalent) affixing free nucleotides in the free seats.

2: Transformation: Bacterial a door, and the plasmids are now free-floating. Bacterial b recording this hereditary material and embed it into its own. It is the same technique to use in genetic engineering.

3: transduction: A technique in which hereditary material from one cell is transferred to another by a adenoral virus. This is also used in gentransplantation where you want a property, such as production of a particular enzyme, this gene can then be spliced into the genome of a bacterium, which then produces the desired enzyme, which then can be collected.

3.0 Hypothesis
A proper hypothesis can not be found because I do not know anything about the different antibiotic suchlike bacteria. However, I have the hypothesis that the type of bacteria that are gram positive will attack better to penicillin. In addition, I expect to see the markings of bakteriehæmning around antibiotic tablets, for the three different types of bacteria. It might be "lucky" to see a form of resistance. This could be seen as small colonies of bacteria in an otherwise growth inhibitory zone. The reason I put quotation marks at Lucky, is even said: Have we created a resistant family of one of the represented bacteria, this could spread. And since we work with "real" antibiotic resistance is real.

4.0 Results
4.1 Schematic

Below is a schematic overview of the results (Table 1):

The places where it has been set into question, says that it was not possible to read the result. By B. cereus, it is because vækshæmmende zones from other antibiotic was so great that a result could not be read. By E. coli, the entire Petri dish, covered only by væksmedie, suggesting that the antibiotic has diffused into the entire plate, and thus has killed all bacteria. Sorry.

Form in the left column shows the type of antibiotic that is measured, and in the next three columns are listed the various bacteria. The result is written to the radius of the dwarfed zone in millimeters. The places with the result 0 is an indication that there was no sterile zone, and therefore, they grew close to the given antibiotic. Below I've made yet another table (Table 2), illustrating the effect of individual antibiotics v. each bacterium (but not E. coli)

5.0 Discussion
As shown in Table 2 are not many similarities between the known bacteria B. cereus and the unknown soil bacterium (B. Magnussenae). It may, however, surprising that B. cereus did not respond to penicillin, because it is gram negative. Generally one can say about the experiment, it was good in some areas and less well on others. For example, it was a good workflow, as for my part was instructive, and many of the results was also satisfactory good, but it was a shame that the outcome of E. coli could not be used, and that many of the other groups attempt went in rags, a broad comparison would be advantageous, since it would also be better able to determine different resistance patterns. As I've mentioned above, there are not many equal units between B. cereus and the unknown soil bacteria, but does one B. cereus up, there really is a ground-living bacteria (thereby not said that soil living bacteria necessarily react the same).
Another interesting observation which emerged in connection with the treatment result was detected by individual bacterial colonies that lived in the otherwise dead zones. This showed that the resistance? One might fear it, a source of error as other bacteria indsluppet the petri dish, I may be excluded because the pattern of growth of the colonies did not indicate this. Had it been a type of resistant bacteria from the start, growth area would be larger - at least we took no chances, and disinfected equipment autoklavemaskinen.

5.1 Antibiotic resistance - a social evil
If, as mentioned above were developed resistance, it would respond well to what is happening in many places in the "real" world - I refer particularly to the agricultural sector, where resistance due to overuse of antibiotics is unfortunately a reality. The problem of antibiotic consumption in Danish primary sector, is it better used as a preventive - that is a prophylactic overuse. It represents therefore an image where diseases tackled before it is used, which translated into figures mean that half of all Danish dairy cows (in traditional agriculture that still accounts for a majority) in the course of a year are treated with antibiotic in order to keep disease below. But a study shows that antibiotic consumption can be reduced substantially without compromising the animals' health. Dairy farmers from this, have partially changed their farming so that the need for preventive antibiotic therapy reduced. These include reflected in the change of housing the design where conventional housing is opmurede buildings with the general high temperature and high humidity caused by lack of air circulation - a paradise for microorganisms. This has the peasants from the experiment eliminated by building stables sit outside walls so that fresh air can circulate. Disease is still prevention, but without medication - for example by spreading of seashells, which prevents the mud around the hooves and udders (which is pathogenic, as again and create good living conditions for microorganisms). Thus it is proved that by relatively simple changes can reduce the need for antibiotics by 50% and still without compromising animal welfare, which is beneficial for all.